Recovery Trajectory of Range of Motion and Its Association With Patient Factors During Early Postoperative Stiffness After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026
Nearly half of cuff repair patients have early stiffness, and those whose stiffness is pain-driven (not fear-driven) are the ones likely to stay stiff at 6 months.
L’étude
Retrospective cohort, n=352 patients who underwent arthroscopic complete repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
Ce qu’ils ont trouvé
46.9% (165/352) met stiffness criteria at 3 months; among these, 20.6% (34/165) had persistent stiffness at 6 months. Higher VAS pain at 3 months independently predicted persistence (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01-2.05, P=.044). Fear/anxiety about retear was the most common reported barrier to rehab overall (50.3%) but was largely reversible; pain was a less common barrier (32.7%) but was over-represented among patients who went on to have persistent stiffness, cited by 67.6% of that group. Note this 67.6% figure describes the composition of the persistent-stiffness group, not a persistence rate conditional on having pain as the barrier, so it shouldn't be read as 'two-thirds of pain-driven patients stay stiff.'
Type d’étude
Single-centre retrospective cohort study, Level of evidence 3, n=352, patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears at what appears to be one institution.
Méthodologie
This is retrospective chart review with all the usual limitations: no protocolised rehab standardisation described, no blinding of ROM/outcome assessors, and the 'primary barrier to rehabilitation' at 3 months is a single self-reported item with no validated instrument or details on how it was elicited, so recall and reporting bias are real risks. The OR of 1.44 has a CI that only just clears 1 (1.01-2.05) and the P value is.044, meaning this is a fragile, borderline-significant finding in a multivariate model whose other covariates and adjustment quality aren't described in the abstract. No mention of loss to follow-up, inter-rater reliability for ROM measurement, or external validation, and single-surgeon/single-centre cohorts often don't generalise to other rehab protocols.
L’analyse
The OR of 1.44 per unit VAS increase is statistically significant but barely so, and translating a VAS-score odds ratio into a clinically meaningful prediction rule is not straightforward; the abstract offers no sensitivity/specificity or a usable pain cutoff a clinician could act on at 3 months. The design is associative, not causal, so this identifies a possible marker of persistent stiffness rather than proving pain drives it, and the interesting qualitative observation (fear-avoidance is common but reversible, pain-driven stiffness persists) is descriptive rather than tested against a comparator.
La limite
The primary barrier variable is a single retrospective self-report with no described measurement method, and the predictive model isn't validated or given a clinically usable threshold, so you cannot yet tell a patient with X pain score they have Y% risk of persistent stiffness.
Étude de référence
This sits within the existing literature on stiffness incidence after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and early passive ROM protocols; it adds a pain-versus-fear phenotyping angle to that picture rather than overturning established early mobilisation evidence.
À appliquer dès lundi
In the subset of patients still meeting stiffness criteria at 3 months (roughly half of repairs), use pain as a soft flag: those citing pain rather than fear/anxiety as their main barrier are the ones more likely to remain stiff at 6 months, so escalate pain management and desensitisation-focused rehab for that group rather than just pushing harder into stretch. This doesn't yet justify a new screening tool or a formal protocol change given the borderline statistics (OR CI 1.01-2.05) and single retrospective cohort.
In practice
Applies to the roughly half of arthroscopic cuff repair patients still meeting stiffness criteria at 3 months, not to routine post-op shoulders generally. In clinic, use the 3-month review to ask what's actually limiting movement: fear/anxiety about the repair responds to reassurance and graded exposure and usually resolves on its own, but a patient who names pain as the main barrier needs escalated pain control and desensitisation work rather than more aggressive stretching, since that's the subgroup still stiff at 6 months. Track recovery with serial Flexion, External rotation and Internal rotation measures (the same thresholds the study used to define stiffness) at 3 and 6 months so escalation is triggered by numbers rather than how the shoulder feels that day. For S&C coaches picking these athletes up for return-to-performance work, treat a pain-driven stiff shoulder as the one to slow down on overhead or pressing progression while a fear-driven stiff shoulder mainly needs confidence-building load exposure; either way this is a weak, single-cohort signal (OR CI 1.01-2.05), so use it to prioritise conversations, not as a formal gate.
Les cinq études qui comptent — chaque semaine, gratuitement.
Nous lisons toute la littérature en médecine du sport, rééducation et performance et analysons les études qui valent votre temps.
Recevoir le numéro hebdomadaire gratuitLire dans votre langue: English · Français · Deutsch · Español · Italiano · Nederlands · Dansk · Svenska